Sunday, February 9, 2014

The Google Analytics Vs. Adobe SiteCatalyst Smackdown

Web analytics is neither child’s play nor impossible to learn, but like most things in life, it is a complex journey (Kaushik, 76).  Getting analytics right requires that you start with basic tools and then you can move on to more sophisticated analytics. With experience and practice, Kaushik states that even a novice can become a powerful analytical Ninja! (Kaushik, p. 76).
Whether you’re looking to boost sales, capture more visitors or identify a new market segment, data analytics software provides a near endless supply of information and insights to help you maximize your marketing ROI.
If you are new to web analytics, it is important to understand what the key dimensions and metrics are and how they will help you understand how analyzing and tracking behavior will help you meet your business and marketing goals. Web analytics can help you to understand both the effectiveness of your marketing efforts and provide deep insights into your target audiences.
Figuring out how your website is being used, and using that knowledge to make it better, starts with knowing who is coming to your site, how long they spend on the site and each page, and how many pages they look at before leaving or buying can give valuable insight into improving your subscription or checkout process” (Hill, 2011). Because they are foundational to all web analytics, there are six key metrics that any tool needs to be able to provide robust reporting. Kaushik states that these metrics include:
  • Visits
  • Unique visitors
  • Pages per visit
  • Average time on site
  • Unique visitors
  • Bounce rate
Overview of Google Analytics and SiteCatalyst
Two of the most commonly used analytics software programs are Google Analytics and Adobe SiteCatalyst. Each has benefits and drawbacks, but deciphering between the two and choosing the best tool is essential to getting the best visibility into your key metrics.  Both if these tools can do an excellent job in providing the foundational analytics above, but they do it in different ways.
Google Analytics is a common tool that is free and will process up to 10 million hits per month. There is a Premium version that offers a number of enhanced features such as processing 1 billion hits per month, more customization, and strong technical support which can cost a flat $150,000 annually; but for most marketers, the free tool can provide you with plenty of insight without paying.
Google describes their Analytic services as follows:
“Google Analytics shows you the full customer picture across ads and videos, websites and social tools, tablets and smartphones. That makes it easier to serve your current customers and win new ones  (www.google.com/analytics) and since no two customers or companies are alike, Google Analytics helps you analyze visitor traffic and paint a complete picture of your audience and their needs, wherever they are along the path to purchase (www.google.com/analytics).
Site Catalyst is offered by Adobe and they state that their tool, like Google Analytics, can “create customized dashboards and reports and share them in a variety of formats and channels. Using Adobe® Analytics, you can quickly identify the most profitable paths through digital assets, determine where visitors are navigating away, and identify critical success metrics for online marketing campaigns (http://www.adobe.com/solutions/digital-analytics/marketing-reports-analytics.html). You can learn more about the Site Catalyst tool and view 6 short video demos at: http://success.adobe.com/en/na/programs/products/digitalmarketing/amc/1310-22066-digital-analytics-solution-featurettes.html?s_osc=701a0000000ngd0AAA&s_iid=701a0000000nXVRAA2
Unlike Google Analytics, SiteCatalyst does not start out with a free model and is estimated to cost well over $100,000 per year. Cost varies according to traffic volume and the service level, and depends on the needs of your company (Chianis, 2013).
 
Start by Understanding their Business Models
Brian Katz, Senior Web Analyst at Cardinal Path tells us that to understand which tool is best for you, you need to start by understanding each of their business models. He explains it as follows:
The Google Analytics business model has always been to encourage the use of Google AdWords. The notion was that if website owners could measure the success of their websites and marketing efforts, they would optimize them and advertise more. Rather than being a free tool, Mr. Katz considers Google Analytics to be a tool made available free of charge in order to support and promote AdWords. Google Analytics is easy to implement, giving you more than enough functionality to measure and gain insights into your website to figure out how to optimize your AdWords spend. It’s also an effective conduit through which AdWords may be advertised to a highly targeted segment of Internet users.
Adobe’s SiteCatalyst is powered by Omniture (Adobe acquired Omniture and its suite of products in 2009). The Adobe/Omniture business model is to maximize revenue by selling a customer at least one product from a suite of products, and then up-selling additional products, features, tools and processing, as well as professional and engineering services. The power of this Software as Service model (SaaS) is in the very wide scope of activities and attributes it can track and the sheer volume of data that Adobe’s Omniture division collects. Omniture data supports other tools, including Warehouse, Discover, Insight, Recommendations and SearchCenter. Your data, as stored by Omniture, translates into revenue potential for Adobe.
Let us look at some specific functionality and dig deeper.
Ease of implementation
Google Analytics is easily implemented on your website, and requires no IT skills. Even a marketer can add Google Analytics to any website by copying a simple Java Script to their site. You can get started right away by visiting www.google.com/analytics and choosing “access Google Analytics” in the top right corner.
The Adobe SiteCatalyst solution demands the skills of a trained professional and requires a significant amount of upfront work (Chianis, 2013). This might be a better solution for the sophisticated marketer in the long run since implementation is highly customized and the data SiteCatalyst gathers can be tailored to their specific metric needs.
Dashboard Reporting
Availability of dashboard reports is critical to providing real time and longitudinal analysis for the marketer. An excellent Slideshare presentation from www.jimmypad.com compares the two solutions and shows the strengths of each solution across different functionality requirements. Based on the needs of the analyst, both solutions can provide strong support. 
Google Analytics can email daily reports in PDF, XML, CSV, and TSV however, the tool limits each user to one default dashboard/report per site while SiteCatalyst provides much greater flexibility by providing hourly email reports in a wider selection of formats including Excel, PDF, HTML & Word
Custom Variables
Google Analytics allows you to set custom variables, but only allows up to five per page. Variables can be set to expire at different times, such after a page view, completion of an event, or at the visit level.
The Adobe SiteCatalyst product has much more robust customization and also allows for up to 75 traffic variables, plus 100 event variables, and 75 conversion variables. Similar to Google Analytics, variables can be set to capture whatever data you want and can expire after a specific time but they can also be stacked on top of each other, giving you the chance to identify a sequence of events (Chianis, 2013).
How long can you keep your data?
Google analytics will keep your data up to 25 months while Adobe SiteCatalyst keeps your data indefinitely, as long as you are a customer.
What is the bottom line?
At the end of the day, choosing the platform that works best for you depends on your business goals and matching those goals to the individual tool. If you are a novice at web analytics, or if you are a marketer in a small department with no analysis support, Google Analytics provides an exceptionally powerful solution that is easy to use and free of charge. As your company grows and includes more sophisticated strategies and analysts, an investment in a tool such as Adobe SiteCatalyst may provide the enhanced solution required.
Would you share your experience with these tools?
 
Want to learn more? Visit
Chianis, A. Google Analytics vs. Adobe SiteCatalyst — Which Data Analysis Platform is Better for Business? Retrieved February 8, 2014 from: http://www.businessbee.com/resources/news/operations-buzz/google-analytics-vs-adobe-sitecatalyst-data-analysis-platform-better-business/
Jay, Jimmy (2011, May 20). OMNITURE VERSUS GOOGLE ANALYTICS. February 7, 2014 from:  http://www.slideshare.net/JimmyJay/google-analytics-vs-omniture-comparative-guide
Katz, (2011, June 22) SiteCatalyst and Google Analytics comparison, conceptually speaking: Part 1. Retrieved February 9, 2014 from: http://raventools.com/blog/sitecatalyst-vs-google-analytics-part-1/
Kaushik, A. (2010) Web Analytics 2.0. Wiley Publishing, Inc. Indianapolis, Indiana
Hill, C. (2011, October 28) 3 Metrics Google Analytics Beginners Should Watch. Retrieved February 4, 2014 from: http://searchengineland.com/3-metrics-google-analytics-beginners-should-watch-98663
Wells, M. (2014, January 6) Lesson 5: Google Analytics. Retrieved February 1, 2014 from: www.ecampus.wvu.edu
 

No comments:

Post a Comment